The Guide to the National Quality Standard - MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss aboutThe Guide to the National Quality Standard. Answer: The rights of a person are one of the basic freedoms avoided to the person in the society keeping in mind their ethical moral and the social needs of the individual. In this essay, the importance of the protection of the rights of the children is discussed along with the ethical dilemmas faced by an individual in providing for those rights. The ethical dilemma of an individual is a situation in which they have to work out between two or more possible choices all of which are correct (Newman, 2002). A person undergoing this dilemma in a social care service may have a great impact on the organization. The United Nations Convention for the Rights of children brought forward a number of rights of the children, which are to be kept in mind by the adults who formulate policies and laws for the governance of the society (Unicef.org, 2018). The rights of the children under the UNCRC takes into consideration the different ways that the children are affected in the society due to the actions o f the adults and therefore takes into account the very different perspective of ascribing them their own rights which are to be kept in mind by all the societies. The case of Mayah is a scenario where the different ethical and the moral duties of the adults responsible for her well being are in conflict presenting a number of social and ethical dilemmas. The overall situation that provides an ethical dilemma among the children of various ages is the proper consideration to be given to the choice of the children considering them as developed self informed individuals. The special preference given to Mayah as per the request of her parents will be difficult for the instructor as more individuals might ask for this and this can lead to discrimination among children (Newman Pollnitz, 2005). The social identity theory of the people often leads to identification of the children from different ethnicities as others among them. This poses an ethical dilemma in the minds of the people and the morality and the ethics of their duty. In the case of Mayah, it is the duty of the instructor to provide what she needs at the childcare and their acting over the instruction of her parents will accentuate the problems. These ethnic and the moral issues are to be heeded in case the situation is to be controlled and improved among the people working in t he children education and the childcare services. Discrimination is a major issue and may change the overall outlook of the children who are discriminated against in the society. there are a number of issues that need to be addressed by the director of the childcare and the parents to come to common terms in the case of Mayah. The ethical, issues and the moral dilemmas come into play as the different issues that are presented in the situation (Kennedy, 2009). The moral and ethical grounds of this scenario cannot be easily assessed as it is exceedingly tough to come to common conclusion based on their individual perceptions of the behavior of Mayah. The issues that are presented in the scenario is a major issue that the adults are taking decision of the needs of the child based on the rules st by them and the rights of the child may be curbed in such scenario. The children rights should not be curbed even in such scenarios where the different children are to be provided by a person keeping in mind the moral duty of the service. The c ode of ethics of the people working in such ethical and moral scenarios face a number of issues due the different scenarios that are faced in working in the social sector. The ethical dilemma, according to me, arises out of the need of the different ethical decisions to be made by an individual in the different scenarios. As a social worker and a family support provider one needs to understanding and adaptable to the different scenarios they may face in their works (Lansdown, 2005). The educator faces a dilemma as he acts against the norms of code of ethics that he has been taught to act upon therefore he cannot curb her right to sleep when she needs that sleep for the request of her parents. The devising of the various policies of the social welfare also needs to heed such scenarios proving the provision of a course of action for the educator in such scenarios. The ethical dilemma faced by the people in these situations by the formulators of the law is to make them more for the social welfare of than just the adults (McNaughton, Smith Lawrence, 2003). The overall situations of the child welfare laws should be kept in mind while making policies for the society. The discrimination among the children by the social workers is one of the major issues faced in the society. There are a number issues faced by the children causing a number of issues that are to be addressed in such a scenario, the parents have their own dilemma of having trouble with the child, the educator has to follow the norms fulfilling the ethical and moral duty and the director has to look forward to the proper running of the childcare and address the issues forwarded by the parents. The self-reflection is an important part of the work among the social workers, which helps them to ethically understand the different issues that are being faced by the children (Dunphy, 2012). The problem arises in the formulation of a different ideology to address all the issues presented in the scenario. The overall challenges presented in the form of the dilemma among the different social workers lead to a number of issues such as improper communications. The lack of communications between t he social workers and the people they provide the service to presents a major issue among the different working social workers in the society. The different laws of the code of ethics of the behavior towards the children should form a national standard of behavioral laws (ACECQA, 2013). The dilemma can be countered by formulating a general set of laws of behavior that would be acceptable towards the children in the modern scenario. The developmental ethics among the children today poses a great ethical dilemma among the educators in different places (DEEWR, 2009). Moreover, according to Early Childhood Australia code of ethics the children have to be given their own rights and be allowed to perform their own course of actions lest they mean any harm. I think there are a number of ways to counter the ethical and the moral dilemma that plagues the different workers working for the welfare of the different parts of the society. The different issues that are to be heeded on by the social workers are the fact that they have a large part to play in the overall development of the society and the cognitive development of the children (Earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au, 2018). In the given scenario the educator should meet with the different people involved I the well being of Mayah and inform the different situations that should be taken care of. It is very tough to set up a common moral ground in case of a single child as the educator cannot address all the issues presented in the situation without the parental support. One of the major issues that the welfare workers face is of the ethnic diversity and discrimination based on their western approach. This is something, which I will counter by self-reflection rather than adopting any outward measures. The whole discrimination dwell of identifying oneself with a group or kind, but as a social worker I am the one who should be serving the society (Australian Childrens Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA), 2013). I think all the social workers should tend to have the humanitarian approach while doing this kind of work. I think in the case of Mayah I have to stick to the Australian code of ethics for the decisions I have to make for the welfare of the child. the lookout of the educator of a childcare is the proper cognitive development of the child, for which she needs the necessary sleep. The educators and families of the child should be in regular contact with each other in such cases. The dilemma the case of Mayah causes has a relatively simple solution that her sleep cycle should be changed and she should be tested for any other problems that is leading to an irritable behavior. To achieve this the parents and the educator should keep a tabulated chart of the behaviors of the child in different scenarios that present themselves through the growth years. The growth and development of the child depends on the daily schedule of the child and it should be made according to her needs and not the requirement of the adults around her (The Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs, 2011). The parents of children from different ethnicities should be told to encourage their children to use common language and not form ethnicity based friendships which has become one of the major issues of discrimination. The laws of Australia protects the children from being discriminated against which all the social workers usually abide by but it becomes exceedingly difficult for them to understand if they discriminate subconsciously. The ethical dilemma in such cases should be tackled by self-contemplation and choosing the best course of action in the given scenario. The overall situation that may present themselves to the workers in this situation may often lead to favoritism towards a certain set of students (Legislation.gov.au, 2018). The scenarios faced in this situation by the organization in such cases have a great impact on the future of the child. Some dilemmas cannot be addressed easily and some situations have to be taken care of keeping in mind the situation and not the laws. Nevertheless the rights of Mayah as a child have to be considered. Therefore, it can be seen that the different issues in this situation can be addressed by using the different social and the cultural measures in the society. The ethical dilemma of the social workers regarding the decision making in the case of children needs to be addressed by the individual using self-reflection. The overall ethical dilemma is the decision to be made in way that the rights of the children are not hampered. The parents the educator and the childcare facility has to reach a common ground to address such issues. References ACECQA (2013). Guide to the National Quality Standard. Retrieved from https://files.acecqa.gov.au/files/National-Quality-Framework-Resources-Kit/NQF-Resource-03-Guide-to-NQS.pdf Alderson, P. (2008). Children's Provision Rights. In Young children's rights: Exploring beliefs, principles and practice (2nd ed., pp. 78-110). London: Open University Press. Australian Childrens Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA). (2013). Guide to the Education and Care Services National Law and the Education and Care Services National Regulations 2011. Retrieved from https://files.acecqa.gov.au/files/National-Quality-Framework-Resources-Kit/NQF-Resource-02-Guide-to-ECS-Law-Regs.pdf DEEWR. (2009). Belonging, Being and Becoming: The Early Years learning Framework for Australia. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/belonging_being_and_becoming_the_early_years_learning_framework_for_australia.pdf Reading 5.1 ECA (2016). Dunphy, E. (2012). Children's participation rights in early childhood education and care: the case of early literacy learning and pedagogy. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20(3), pp. 290-299. Earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au. (2018).Code of Ethics. [online] Available at: https://www.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ECA-COE-Brochure-2016.pdf [Accessed 22 Jan. 2018]. Kennedy. (2009). Ethics: A Part of everyday practice in child care. Putting Children First the magazine of the National Childcare Accreditation Council (NCAC), 29 (pp. 9-11). Lansdown, G. (2005). Can you hear me? The right of young children to participate in the decisions affecting them. The Netherlands: Bernard Van Leer Foundation. Legislation.gov.au. (2018).Australian Education Act 2013. [online] Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2013A00067 [Accessed 22 Jan. 2018]. McNaughton, G., Smith, K., Lawrence, H. (2003). Hearing young childrens voices. Children's Services Branch, ACT Department of Education, Youth and Family Services. https://www.children.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/1065100/under5report.pdf(If the link doesnt open use your internet browser). Newman, L. (2002). Responding ethically when families and professionals disagree. Every Child, 8(2), p. 17. Newman, L., Pollnitz ,L. (2005). Understanding Ethics. In Working with children and families: Professional, legal and ethical issues. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education. The Ministerial Council for Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs. (2011). Education and Care Services National Regulations. Retrieved from https://www.acecqa.gov.au/national-regulations OR https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/regulation/2011/653 Unicef.org. (2018).A summary of the rights under the Convention on the Rights of the Child. [online] Available at: https://www.unicef.org/crc/files/Rights_overview.pdf [Accessed 22 Jan. 2018].